An Open GenAI Business Case Analysis Best Practice: A Methodology for Data Program Transformation

Appendix B: Templates and Checklists

This appendix contains templates and checklists to support the key activities outlined in the GenAI Business Case Analysis methodology. These tools are intended to provide structure and consistency to the analysis process.

Template B.1: Stakeholder Analysis Matrix

Purpose: This matrix is a foundational tool to be used during Phase 1: Initiation and Scoping. Its purpose is to systematically identify all individuals, groups, or organizations that have an interest in or will be affected by the GenAI project. By analyzing their interests, influence, and needs, the project team can develop a targeted engagement strategy to foster buy-in, manage expectations, and ensure the final solution is user-centric and meets genuine business needs.

Instructions:

  1. Identify Stakeholders: Brainstorm and list all potential stakeholders in the first column. Consider internal groups (e.g., different departments, leadership) and external groups (e.g., partner agencies, public users). The wildland fire reports identify stakeholders such as National/Regional Planners, Incident Command, and Incident Operations. 
  2. Analyze Interest and Influence: For each stakeholder, assess their level of interest in the project and their degree of influence over its outcome, using the 1-5 scoring key. This helps prioritize engagement efforts.
  3. Define Key Interests/Needs: Document what each stakeholder cares about most in relation to the project. What are their primary needs, goals, or potential concerns?
  4. Develop Engagement Strategy: Based on the analysis, determine the most appropriate strategy for engaging each stakeholder. This is not a one-size-fits-all approach; different groups require different levels and methods of communication.
  5. Define Key Messages: Outline the core messages that need to be communicated to each stakeholder group to ensure alignment and manage expectations.

Interest Scoring Key:

  • 1: Very Low (Minimal interest in the project’s outcome)
  • 3: Medium (Aware of the project and its potential impact)
  • 5: Very High (The project’s success is critical to their own success)

Influence Scoring Key:

  • 1: Very Low (No ability to affect project decisions or outcomes)
  • 3: Medium (Can influence opinions and some decisions)
  • 5: Very High (Has direct authority or significant power to halt or advance the project)

Having established a strong set of templates in Appendix B, we will now proceed to Appendix C. This section will formally tie the methodology back to the provided OGC reports, demonstrating how they serve as a successful, real-world application of these principles. This directly addresses your original request to consider the steps taken in the creation of those reports. This checklist is a crucial tool for operationalizing the data analysis phase. Here is a draft of that template.

 

Stakeholder / GroupInterest (1-5)Influence (1-5)Key Interests / NeedsEngagement StrategyKey Messages
Example: Incident Command (IMT)55Wants “Command Decision Informatics” , including insights on fuel behavior, changing conditions, and resource tracking. Needs trustworthy, real-time data to support high-stakes decisions.Involve directly in use case definition and prototype testing. Conduct regular (daily/weekly) briefings during pilot phases. Ensure their feedback directly influences feature prioritization.The GenAI tool is designed to augment, not replace, command experience by providing faster data synthesis and predictive insights to enhance situational awareness.
National / Regional Planners44Want “National Readiness & Overall Incidents Metrics” , risk awareness, and asset tracking. Interested in strategic-level dashboards and long-term planning tools.Provide quarterly progress briefings. Consult on the design of strategic dashboards. Involve in the review of the final Modernization Blueprint.This project will provide new data streams and analytical capabilities to support national readiness planning and resource allocation strategies.
Field Operators / Single Resources53Primary interest is safety and tactical efficiency. Need tools for egress modeling, identifying safety zones, and understanding immediate risks related to topography and weather.Conduct user workshops and “day-in-the-life” interviews. Use their feedback to design a simple, intuitive, and highly reliable user interface. Involve them in field testing of any mobile components.The goal is to provide a tool that enhances your safety and tactical effectiveness by giving you critical information (e.g., on safe egress routes) quickly and reliably.
GIS Specialists (GISS)44Interested in data integration, data standards, and automating the generation of geospatial products. Need to ensure the GenAI solution integrates with existing GIS workflows (e.g., PMS-936) and authoritative data sources.Consult on all aspects of data readiness, data modeling, and system integration. Involve as key members of the technical development and testing team.This solution will automate many manual data integration and map generation tasks, freeing up your time for higher-level spatial analysis and decision support.

 

Template B.2: GenAI Use Case Prioritization Matrix

Purpose: This matrix is a tool to be used during Phase 2: Business Analysis to objectively evaluate and rank potential GenAI use cases. It helps the analysis team focus on initiatives that offer the highest potential mission impact and the greatest likelihood of success.

Instructions:

  1. List all brainstormed use cases in the first column.
  2. For each use case, provide a brief, one-sentence description.
  3. Score each use case from 1 to 5 for each of the evaluation criteria, using the scoring key below.
  4. Sum the scores for each use case to get a Total Score.
  5. Rank the use cases based on their Total Score to determine their priority.
  6. Provide a brief justification for the scoring and any relevant notes.

Scoring Key:

  • 1: Very Low / Negligible
  • 2: Low
  • 3: Medium
  • 4: High
  • 5: Very High / Critical
Use Case Name & DescriptionAlignment with Strategic Goals (1-5)Stakeholder Need / Impact (1-5)GenAI Value / Potential for Improvement (1-5)Technical Feasibility (1-5)Data Readiness (1-5)Total ScorePriority RankJustification / Notes
Example: Community Risk & Resilience AssessmentAssess community wildfire risk based on local data to highlight high-risk neighborhoods for mitigation efforts.5554423Addresses the critical mission of community safety. Rated as High Need and High GenAI Value in source report. Data is largely available but may have gaps in structure/fuels data.

 

Template B.3: Data Readiness Checklist

Purpose: This checklist is a detailed tool to be used during Phase 3: Technical and Data Analysis. It provides a systematic framework for evaluating the suitability of individual data sources for the GenAI project. By completing this checklist for each potential dataset, the project team can ensure a consistent and thorough assessment, identify data-related risks early, and accurately scope the effort required for data engineering and integration.

Instructions:

  1. Use a separate copy of this checklist for each individual data source being evaluated.
  2. Thoroughly investigate each question, consulting data owners, documentation, and performing technical tests where possible.
  3. Document all findings, especially any identified issues, gaps, or required actions in the “Findings and Required Actions” section.
  4. Assign an overall readiness score to summarize the dataset’s suitability for immediate use.
  5. The findings from these checklists should be used as direct inputs into the project’s overall Risk Assessment Matrix (Template B.2) and implementation plan.

Data Source Identification

  • Data Source Name:
  • Data Owner / Steward:
  • URL / Endpoint:
  • Brief Description:

Summary Assessment

  • Overall Readiness Score (1-5): (1=High Risk/Not Ready, 5=Low Risk/Ready to Use)
  • Summary Findings: (Briefly summarize the key strengths and weaknesses of this data source.)
  • Required Actions: (List the critical next steps, e.g., “Develop ETL script for cleaning,” “Finalize data use agreement,” “Add ‘PII de-identification’ to risk matrix.”)
CategoryQuestionScoreFindings and Required Actions
1. AccessibilityIs the data source publicly accessible without authentication?
Is an Application Programming Interface (API) available for data access?
Are there any costs associated with accessing or using the data (e.g., API fees, subscription costs)?
Is the data format structured and machine-readable (e.g., JSON, CSV, Shapefile, GeoTIFF)?
2. Quality & IntegrityIs the data current and actively maintained?
Is the dataset complete, or are there significant gaps/missing values?
Is there known or potential bias in the data that could impact the model?
Is the data considered accurate and reliable by subject matter experts?
Does the temporal and geographic coverage of the data meet the project’s requirements?
3. Usability & DocumentationIs a data dictionary, schema, or comprehensive metadata available?
Is the data’s lineage and provenance documented, allowing for clear traceability?
Is the data structure straightforward, or will it require a complex ETL (Extract, Transform, Load) process?
4. Governance, Rights, & EthicsDoes the data have clear licensing terms that permit its use for this project?
Does the dataset contain Personally Identifiable Information (PII) or other sensitive data?
If PII is present, is there a plan and technical capability to de-identify or secure it?
Are there any other ethical considerations for using this data (e.g., related to community privacy or protected species)?

Template B.4: Risk Assessment and Mitigation Matrix

Purpose: This matrix is a critical tool for Phase 3: Technical and Data Analysis. It provides a structured framework to systematically identify, analyze, prioritize, and plan for the mitigation of risks associated with a GenAI project. Proactively managing risks is essential for ensuring project success and building stakeholder trust.

Instructions:

  1. Identify Risks: Brainstorm potential risks and list them in the Risk Description column. Consider all categories: Technical, Operational, Ethical, and Security. The “Challenges” and “Key Considerations” sections of the source reports provide excellent starting points for common GenAI risks.
  2. Categorize: Assign each risk to a Risk Category.
  3. Analyze and Score:
    • Assess the Likelihood of each risk occurring, using the 1-5 scoring key.
    • Assess the potential Impact on the project or mission if the risk occurs, using the 1-5 scoring key.
    • Calculate the Risk Score by multiplying Likelihood x Impact. This score helps to prioritize which risks require the most attention.
  4. Plan Mitigation:
    • For each high-priority risk, define a specific Mitigation Strategy. This strategy should be an actionable plan to either reduce the likelihood of the risk or lessen its impact.
    • Assign an Owner responsible for implementing the mitigation strategy.
    • Track the Status of the mitigation action (e.g., Not Started, In Progress, Complete).
  5. Review Regularly: This matrix should be a living document, reviewed and updated regularly by the project team and stakeholders.

Likelihood Scoring Key:

  • 1: Rare (Unlikely to occur)
  • 2: Unlikely
  • 3: Possible (May occur)
  • 4: Likely
  • 5: Almost Certain (Expected to occur)

Impact Scoring Key:

  • 1: Insignificant (No notable impact on cost, schedule, or mission)
  • 2: Minor
  • 3: Moderate (Noticeable impact on cost, schedule, or mission)
  • 4.: Major
  • 5: Critical/Catastrophic (Threatens project success or mission objectives)

 

Risk IDRisk CategoryRisk DescriptionLikelihood (%)Impact (1-5)Risk Score (L x I)Mitigation StrategyOwnerStatus
1TechnicalThe GenAI model produces undesirable outputs such as inaccuracies, “hallucinations,” or goal drift.8054Augment the foundational LLM with Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) using curated, domain-specific knowledge bases. Implement a human-in-the-loop review process for all critical outputs before they are finalized or acted upon.Tech LeadIn Progress
2Ethical / GovernanceThe GenAI solution has poor traceability and does not provide clear data provenance for its outputs, eroding user trust and making validation difficult.8043.2Adopt the OGC TrainingDML-AI standard to ensure high-quality content in the data pipeline, with micro-citations and data headers to ensure traceability and provenance.Data Gov. LeadNot Started
3OperationalEnd-users are slow to adopt the new tool due to a lack of trust, a preference for existing models, and insufficient literacy on the GenAI solution’s capabilities and limitations.6055Develop and execute a comprehensive change management plan. This includes targeted training, clear communication on the solution’s benefits and limitations, and establishing a continuous feedback loop with users.Project ManagerNot Started
4SecurityThe GenAI solution processes sensitive or Personally Identifiable Information (PII) without proper controls, creating a privacy or security breach.4054Establish Zero Trust Architecture concepts to filter data. Implement a solution to de-identify sensitive values before they are processed by the GenAI model (e.g., Skyflow GPT Privacy).Security OfficerIn Progress

Template B.5: Capability-to-Use-Case Mapping Matrix

Purpose: This matrix is a strategic tool for Phase 4: Modernization Blueprint and Business Case. Its purpose is to create a clear, traceable link between the prioritized business use cases (the “why”) and the specific technical capabilities that need to be built to address them (the “what”). This ensures that all development effort is justified by a business need, aids in creating a logical implementation roadmap, and helps communicate the solution structure to both business and technical stakeholders.

Instructions:

  1. In the first column, list the highest-priority use cases identified in the Use Case Prioritization Matrix (Template B.1).
  2. For each use case, identify one or more specific Required Capabilities needed to make it successful. The capabilities listed in the OGC reports (such as “Risk Assessment Modeling” or “Automated Claims Processing”) serve as excellent examples.
  3. Briefly describe what the capability does in the context of the use case.
  4. Identify the core
    Enabling Technology (e.g., LLM, RAG, GAN) required to build the capability.
  5. Assign a Development Priority (High, Medium, Low) to each capability to help sequence the work in the implementation roadmap.
Use Case (The “Why”)Required Capability (The “What”)Capability Description (How it helps)Enabling Technology (The “How”)Priority
Community Risk & Resilience AssessmentRisk Assessment ModelingProcess weather, climate, and fuel load data to create dynamic wildfire risk assessments for municipalities.LLM, RAG, NLPHigh
Community Risk & Resilience AssessmentGeospatial Data AnalysisAnalyze spatial datasets (e.g., topography, vegetation, fire history) to model risk and generate neighborhood-level insights.GAN, RAGHigh
Claim Efficiency & AutomationAutomated Claims ProcessingUse natural language processing (NLP) and computer vision to extract and analyze claims data from images, reports, and videos.NLP, GAN, LLMMedium
Predictive Risk & Pricing ModelsPredictive Pricing ModelsLeverage historical claims and geospatial data to create dynamic, location-based pricing models.LLM, RAGMedium
Grant & Funding Strategy DevelopmentNatural Language Generation (NLG)Create tailored reports, educational content, and grant applications based on data inputs.LLMLow

Template B.6: Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) Worksheet

Purpose: This worksheet is a key component of Phase 4: Modernization Blueprint and Business Case. It provides a structured format to estimate the costs and benefits associated with the proposed GenAI initiative over a defined period (typically 3-5 years). A thorough CBA is essential for justifying the investment and enabling leadership to make a sound financial decision.

Instructions:

  1. Work with representatives from finance, IT, and the business unit to identify and estimate all potential costs and benefits.
  2. Estimate Costs: Document all one-time (Capital Expenditures/CapEx) and recurring (Operational Expenditures/OpEx) costs. Be as comprehensive as possible.
  3. Estimate Benefits: Document both tangible (quantifiable in monetary terms) and intangible (qualitative but mission-critical) benefits.
    • For tangible benefits, clearly state the assumptions used to calculate the monetary value (e.g., “Saves 200 person-hours per year at a blended rate of $75/hour”).
    • For intangible benefits, describe the positive impact on the organization’s mission or strategic goals.
  4. Calculate Financial Metrics: Use the total costs and tangible benefits to calculate summary financial metrics such as ROI and Payback Period.
  5. Review and Refine: The CBA should be reviewed for completeness and reasonableness by all relevant stakeholders.

Part 1 – Costs

Cost CategoryDescription & AssumptionsYear 1 ($)Year 2 ($)Year 3 ($)Total ($)
A. One-Time Costs (CapEx)
Initial DevelopmentCost for internal staff and contractors for model development, tuning, and integration.
Software & LicensesInitial purchase of any required software platforms or licenses.
Hardware/InfrastructureInitial cost for any required on-premise servers, GPU hardware, or cloud setup.
Initial User TrainingCost to develop and deliver initial training to end-users and support staff.
Subtotal One-Time Costs
B. Recurring Costs (OpEx)
Cloud / API FeesOngoing fees for cloud services (compute, storage) or third-party GenAI model APIs.
Software MaintenanceAnnual fees for software maintenance, subscriptions, and support.
Data Acquisition/StorageCosts associated with acquiring or maintaining datasets needed for the model.
Personnel (Maintenance)Salaries/FTE portion for staff dedicated to maintaining and governing the solution.
Ongoing TrainingCosts for refresher training for existing users and training for new staff.
Model RetrainingEstimated cost for periodic model retraining to incorporate new data and prevent drift.
Subtotal Recurring Costs
TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS

 

Part 2 – Benefits

Benefit CategoryDescription & AssumptionsYear 1 ($)Year 2 ($)Year 3 ($)Total ($)
C. Tangible (Quantifiable) Benefits
Productivity GainsValue of person-hours saved on specific tasks (e.g., report generation, data analysis).
Operational Cost SavingsReduction in costs for materials, travel, or other operational line items.
Risk MitigationAvoidance of costs associated with fines, penalties, or damages from mitigated risks.
TOTAL TANGIBLE BENEFITS
D. Intangible (Qualitative) Benefits – Description of Mission Impact
Improved Decision-MakingEnhances situational awareness and provides more accurate, timely insights for command decisions.
Enhanced Mission OutcomesDirectly contributes to improved community resilience, safety, or more effective environmental remediation.
Increased CapacityEnables scalability in data processing beyond human capabilities, allowing for more comprehensive analysis.
Improved Staff MoraleReduces tedious, manual work, allowing staff to focus on higher-value, mission-critical activities.

 

Part 3 – Summary

MetricCalculationResult
Total Project CostTotal One-Time Costs + Total Recurring Costs
Total Tangible BenefitTotal from Section C
Net Benefit / (Loss)Total Tangible Benefit – Total Project Cost
Return on Investment (ROI)(Net Benefit / Total Project Cost) x 100
Payback PeriodThe point in time at which cumulative benefits equal cumulative costs.

Template B.7: Example Plan Activities

Purpose: This template is designed to translate the high-level implementation roadmap from Phase 4 into a detailed, short-term (e.g., 3-6 month) action plan. It helps teams organize their work into thematic streams, define concrete activities, and align them with measurable outcomes for a specific phase of the project.

Instructions:

  1. Define the Phase: Give the current implementation phase a clear, descriptive name (e.g., “Phase I – Foundational Investigation,” “Phase II – Prototype Development”).
  2. Set the Timeframe: Define the duration for this action plan (e.g., “Next 3-6 months”).
  3. Structure Activities by Theme: For each of the core themes (Business Value, Data, Technology, Management), list the specific, actionable tasks to be completed within the timeframe. Use action verbs (e.g., “Hold workshop,” “Inventory data,” “Pilot tools”).
  4. Define Maturity Goal and Outcomes:
    • For the Maturity Space, describe the overall goal for this phase in terms of capability growth (e.g., “Discover Chasm Depths,” “Build the Bridge,” “Scale the Solution”).
    • For the Outcomes, clearly state what will be achieved and understood by the end of the phase for each theme. This ensures the work is tied to tangible results.

Example Plan Activities

Next 3-6 months

ThemesPhase I – Investigating the Chasm
Inventory and Pilot AND investigate business case parameters 
Business Value• Hold pilot definition workshop to Define and decompose MISSION QUESTIONS backlog
• Work with the ongoing results from Phase I PILOT to:
– identify requirement GAPS
– additional mission questions and maintain log
– apply to operational or planning scenarios
– evaluate benefits with initial stakeholders,
Data• Research, INVENTORY and evaluate and test the Data quality for initial set of associated priority business objectives;
• Identify GAPS and integrity issues in data sources,
• Develop mitigation approaches for issues and test.
Technology• INVENTORY existing / owned systems and technologies that are required to would support automation/ analysis of data to business objectives
• INVENTORY the As-Is suite of AI/analytical tools and use constraints within enterprise• PILOT data usability (visualization, reasoning, interoperability, automation)
Management• Identify initial key stakeholder community for PILOT involvement
• Initiate ownership and advocacy for Activity
• Create PROJECT STRUCTURE with objectives
• Develop basic communication plan for stakeholders
Maturity SpaceDiscover Chasm Depths
OutcomesBusiness: Getting a sense of what BI means to the business
Data: Assessing Data Quality and readiness
Tech: Assessing flexibility of existing tech.

 

Next 6-18 months

ThemesPhase II – Planning and Designing the Bridge
Iterative Demonstration to establish full business case for working operating model
Business Value• Continue to feed ‘questions backlog’ for ongoing PILOTS, efforts
• Define on-going operating Model
– Assess and understand implications and benefits on future operating model and business practices
– Initiate development of business value proposition
– Identify and document key Use Stories and Epics from Backlogs
Data• Explore DATA LIFECYCLE and STANDARDS needs for Phase 1 with IT
• Develop alternative strategies to determine reproducibility of processes and data integrity for reuse
• Iterate GAP analysis next set of business objective
• Develop CORE DATA MODEL and supporting metadata
Technology• Continue expanding architecture qualities by executing PILOTs
• Investigate GAPS in As-Is technology for full usability of analysis results. 
• Conduct Technology and Cost Assessment for new Operating Model
• Develop alternative architecture solutions and do cost benefit.
• Establish Service Level needs to cost out Labor Operations
Management• Develop NEGOTIATE and CONSOLIDATION alternatives and strategies
• Enhance communication plan to address new stakeholders
• Propose PROGRAM/DEPARTMENT funding strategy
Maturity SpacePlan for Chasm
OutcomesBusiness: Evaluating business benefits on current operations.
Data: Position data management for predicable and accurate support of business needs
Tech: Evaluating and designing the Target Architecture Solution

12-24 months and Beyond

ThemesPhase III – Building the Bridge
Plan, Fund, and Execute fully sponsored program
Business Value• SIGN OFF on target operating model and business practice benefits, value message
• SIGN OFF on target technology architecture and costs
• SIGN OFF on data lifecycle management plan and costs
• Develop full investment BUSINESS CASE capital and operations
DataSTANDARDIZE data and automation processes to provide information qualities
• Extend CORE DATA model to full scope of data associated to business objectives
• Continue to Integrate data assets with program’s DATA LIFECYLE approach
Technology• Incorporate Technology requirements and cost estimates into BUSINESS CASE
• Acquire and implement target architecture solutions.
• Establish Formal Agile PM for executing to Questions Backlog
• Conduct IT Maturity Model Assessment to establish O&M Service Level Needs & plan
Management• Extend the stakeholder community to include all who have ownership in the systems and data that that will be exploited
• Develop GOVERNANCE solution with IT
Negotiate and Consolidate with key business and IT stakeholders and develop change management strategies and communication approach
Maturity SpaceCross Chasm
OutcomesBusiness: Investing and leading the data and business changes
Data: Managed lifecycle approach to “valued” data
Tech: Implement Architecture Solution