- About 50 people. NOAA and USGS on Fed side primarily.
- Pushing forward on agenda to see if we have progressed on ideation pragmatism since Geodata2011.
- Focus is on Cultural and Financial issues limiting inter-agency connection.
- Term agile government came up often… with some laughs, but some defenders (Relates to our smartleangovernment.com efforts with ACT-IAC)
- Scientists hear Architecture as Big IT contracts and IT infrastructure, not process improvement, data integration, goal/mission alignment, etc., so there is clear vernacular issues.
- FGDC and tons of other standards/organizing bodies seen as competing and confusing
- data.gov and open data policy hot topic (Seen as good steps, low quality data) – “geoplatform” mentioned exactly “zero” times (doh!)
- geo data lifecycle primarily on the latter end of cycle (citations, discovery, publication for reusability, credit) but not much on the project coordination, data acq coordination, no marketplace chatter, little on coordinating sensor investment
- General questions on how scientists were interested on how intel groups can be reached
- Big push on ESIP
- Concrete steps suggested were best practices to agencies and professors
- Data Management is not taught, so what do we expect? You get what you pay for.
- Finally, big push on how to tie grassroots efforts and top-down efforts together – grassroots agreed we need to showcase more, earlier, and get into the communities top-down folks are looking at.
- Not high Federal representation there, and agreed with limited Government travel budgets, we need to bring these concepts to them and meet on their meetings, agendas, conferences, circuits, and push these concepts and needs.
Again, lots of great notes from breakouts on roadblocks, geoscience perspective, concrete steps, etc. across the following topics on the following URL (Google Docs under “notes” links):
- Of Performance, Portfolio, Architecture, Evangelism, Policy, or other what is more important to the GeoScientist that needs to be addressed in order to improve inter-agency coordination
- You noted you want to truly disrupt or re-invent the motivation and other aspects in the culture, what was discussed related to doing such – inter-agency wiki commons a la intelipedia? Gamification and how incents resource Management MMORPGs – i.e. transparent and fun way to incentivize data maturity? Crowdsourcing a la mechanical turk to help in cross-agency knowledge-sharing? Hackathon/TC Disrupt Competitions to help in showcase? Combindation – i.e. Gamify metadata lifecycle with crowd model?
- After registering data, metadata, good citations, and doing all the data lifecycle management, and if we are to “assume internet”, who is responsible for the SEO Rank to help people find scientific data in the internet – who assures/enhances schema.org registrations? who aligns signals to help with keywords, and thousands of other potential signals? especially in response to events needing geoscience data? who helps push data.gov and domain catalogs to be harvested by others?